The Best of PubMed (Part II)
/Spring has finally arrived in Northern California, and with it course assignments that require me to spend an inordinate amount of time searching for literature on PubMed. As a reminder for readers not constantly reminded of the glories of this website, PubMed is a catalogue of papers published by most of the worlds biomedical journals. For those of you with long memories, back in February I wrote a post highlighting some of the more unusual papers included in the 19 million scientific citations listed by PubMed. Since that first post, I've been keeping my eyes peeling for more epic examples of odd research that has, by one way or another, seen the light of publication.
Without further ado, here are just a few of the papers I've found with subjects that range from humorous, awkward, to just plain weird. Some of these papers were discovered (and shared) by members of my Twitter community, some I actively searched for, and some I came across in the course of a legitimate literature search. As with Part 1, some of these papers are not suitable for work, children, or those with weak stomachs and vivid imaginations - these I have marked: consider yourself warned.
In the category of Additions, Fun Times and Feelings:
In the category of One Step Closer to Cylon-Human Relationships:
In the category of This Title Can't Accurately Reflect The Paper's Actual Subject, Right?
In the category of Research that Should Totally be Used to Explain Human Behavior:
In the category of Unexpected, but in Retrospect Very Logical
In the category of I Was Searching For Optic Flow Papers, And This is What Your Give Me?
In the category of You Can Read Minds? Okay, Prove It.
NOTE: This last paper may be disturbing to people. But its a perfect example of the mind-boggling research that corporations fund for publication, and has also received quite a bit of press in the last month. I would be remiss if I didn't include it.
Effect of an electronic control device exposure on a methamphetamine-intoxicated animal model. Dawes DM et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):436-43. [Also known as that study where people payed by TASER International gave sheep meth and then tased them]
And that's all for now. Until next time, happy PubMed-ing!